Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
J Nephrol ; 34(3): 639-648, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33713333

RESUMO

A recently published nomenclature by a "Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes" (KDIGO) Consensus Conference suggested that the word "kidney" should be used in medical writings instead of "renal" or "nephro" when referring to kidney disease and kidney health. Whereas the decade-old move to use "kidney" more frequently should be supported when communicating with the public-at-large, such as the World Kidney Day, or in English speaking countries in communications with patients, care-partners, and non-medical persons, our point of view is that "renal" or "nephro" should not be removed from scientific and technical writings. Instead, the terms can coexist and be used in their relevant contexts. Cardiologists use "heart" and "cardio" as appropriate such as "heart failure" and "cardiac care units" and have not replaced "cardiovascular" with "heartvessel", for instance. Likewise, in nephrology, we consider that "chronic kidney disease" and "continuous renal replacement therapy" should coexist. We suggest that in scientific writings and technical communications, the words "renal" and "nephro" and their derivatives are more appropriate and should be freely used without any pressure by medical journals to compel patients, care-partners, healthcare providers, researchers and other stakeholders to change their selected words and terminologies. We call to embrace the terms "kidney", "renal" and "nephro" as they are used in different contexts and ask that scientific and medical journals not impose terminology restrictions for kidney disease and kidney health. The choice should be at the discretion of the authors, in the different contexts including in scientific journals.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Nefrologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Consenso , Humanos , Rim
5.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 33(10): 1842-1852, 2018 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29672712

RESUMO

Background: Individuals on hemodialysis bear substantial symptom burdens, but providers often underappreciate patient symptoms. In general, standardized, patient-reported symptom data are not captured during routine dialysis care. We undertook this study to better understand patient experiences with symptoms and symptom reporting. In exploratory interviews, we sought to describe hemodialysis nurse and patient care technician perspectives on symptoms and symptom reporting. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 42 US hemodialysis patients and 13 hemodialysis clinic personnel. Interviews were conducted between February and October 2017 and were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Seven themes were identified in patient interviews: (i) symptoms engendering symptoms, (ii) resignation that life is dependent on a machine, (iii) experiencing the life intrusiveness of dialysis, (iv) developing adaptive coping strategies, (v) creating a personal symptom narrative, (vi) negotiating loss of control and (vii) encountering the limits of the dialysis delivery system. Overall, patient symptom experiences and perceptions appeared to influence symptom-reporting tendencies, leading some patients to communicate proactively about symptoms, but others to endure silently all but the most severe symptoms. Three themes were identified in exploratory clinic personnel interviews: (i) searching for symptom explanations, (ii) facing the limits of their roles and (iii) encountering the limits of the dialysis delivery system. In contrast to patients, clinic personnel generally believed that most patients were inclined to spontaneously report their symptoms to providers. Conclusions: Interviews with patients and dialysis clinic personnel suggest that symptom reporting is highly variable and likely influenced by many personal, treatment and environmental factors.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Diálise Renal/métodos , Diálise Renal/psicologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adaptação Psicológica , Idoso , Competência Clínica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Percepção , Diálise Renal/normas
7.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 69(1): 5-7, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28007192
8.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 11(9): 1703-1712, 2016 09 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27197911

RESUMO

Including target populations in the design and implementation of research trials has been one response to the growing health disparities endemic to our health care system, as well as an aid to study generalizability. One type of community-based participatory research is "Patient Centered-Research", in which patient perspectives on the germane research questions and methodologies are incorporated into the study. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) has mandated that meaningful patient and stakeholder engagement be incorporated into all applications. As of March 2015, PCORI funded seven clinically-focused studies of patients with kidney disease. The goal of this paper is to synthesize the experiences of these studies to gain an understanding of how meaningful patient and stakeholder engagement can occur in clinical research of kidney diseases, and what the key barriers are to its implementation. Our collective experience suggests that successful implementation of a patient- and stakeholder-engaged research paradigm involves: (1) defining the roles and process for the incorporation of input; (2) identifying the particular patients and other stakeholders; (3) engaging patients and other stakeholders so they appreciate the value of their own participation and have personal investment in the research process; and (4) overcoming barriers and challenges that arise and threaten the productivity of the collaboration. It is our hope that the experiences of these studies will further interest and capacity for incorporating patient and stakeholder perspectives in research of kidney diseases.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Nefropatias , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Participação do Paciente , Participação dos Interessados , Humanos , Seleção de Pacientes
18.
Nephrol Nurs J ; 35(3): 265-70, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18649587

RESUMO

Most patients with mineral and bone disorders do not simultaneously achieve KDOQI target goals for parathyroid hormone, calcium, phosphorus, and the calcium-phosphorus product. A multidisciplinary team composed of the patient, nephrologists, nephrology nurses, renal dietitians, social workers, patient care technicians, clinical pharmacists, and physical therapists can help improve the coordination of care for mineral and bone disorders. The roles of team members are reviewed, with emphasis on nephrology nurses.


Assuntos
Doenças Ósseas/terapia , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Diálise Renal , Gestão da Qualidade Total/organização & administração , Doenças Ósseas/diagnóstico , Doenças Ósseas/etiologia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Comportamento Cooperativo , Dietética/organização & administração , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Nefrologia/organização & administração , Enfermeiros Clínicos/organização & administração , Avaliação em Enfermagem , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Objetivos Organizacionais , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Especialidade de Fisioterapia/organização & administração , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Papel Profissional , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Serviço Social/organização & administração
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...